i

Call for Papers. Special Number "100 Years of Social Work: Discussions and Perspectives on the Discipline's Past, Present and Future". Submissions in Spanish or English until the 30th October 2024 for publication in April 2025 (Issue 9). For more information please see the following link.

Get out of prison in Chile: uneven territorial concentrations and municipal absence

Authors

Abstract

This article analyzes the return of former inmates to their neighborhoods once they leave prison, emphasizing the needs and barriers that these individuals face in order to reintegrate into Chilean society and the apparent invisibility of this phenomenon. To do this, we calculated prison system’s discharge rates for each municipal territory, based on administrative data from the Prison Bureau (year 2016). Then, for the communes with higher rates we reviewed their websites as well as contacted them by phone to find out what services they may have available for people leaving prison and what were the procedures to obtain access to specialized, social services in the commune. Our results showed that: i) the return of former inmates to their communities occurs disproportionately for certain territories over others ii) most municipalities with highest rates had no specific programs to support the return of former inmates (neighbors who are coming back to the community) and that iii) the invisibility of this phenomenon (concentrations of individuals returning from prison) can have negative implications for both the social integration of the incoming neighbors and the social cohesion of communities where they return to.

Keywords:

former prisoners; prisons; discharges; Chile; municipalities.

Author Biographies

Guillermo Sanhueza, Loyola University Chicago

Académico en la Universidad de Loyola Chicago, Estados Unidos. Sus áreas de investigación y docencia se relacionan a la reinserción social, las condiciones carcelarias, el rol de los funcionarios/as penitenciarios/as en la vida intra penitenciaria, y los procesos de retorno a la comunidad posteriores al encierro. Actualmente dirige el proyecto Fondef IDeA #id21i10255 “Prototipo de gestión integrada para una reinserción social eficaz”.
Correo electrónico: gsanhueza@luc.edu
ORCID ID:https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1971-7362

Fernanda Ponce Navarro, Universidad Alberto Hurtado

Degree in Criminology from the Catholic University of Chile, and a degree in Social Sciences (Sociology) from the Diego Portales University. She is currently completing her Master’s degree in Prevention, Urban Security and Criminal Policy at the Universidad Alberto Hurtado. She did an internship at the Ex
Penitenciaria, where she studied physical violence among inmates of the same prison. Her areas of interest focus on criminal policy and its relationship with reinsertion, in addition to studying how integrated gender concepts are in it. She is a research assistant in the Fondef IDeA #id21i10255 “Prototype of integrated management for effective social reinsertion”. 

E-mail: fer.ponce.navarro@gmail.com

Ignacio Godoy Delgado, Universidad Católica de Chile

Degree in Social Work from the Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (PUC), a Master’s degree in Social Work from the Universidad de Chile and a diploma in Management Skills and Team Management from the Universidad de Chile. He currently works at the Social Integration Center Conecta Las Condes, under the Public Safety Directorate of the commune. He has also worked as a research assistant in two
projects related to reinsertion: Fondecyt Initiation #11150840 “The moral performance of Chilean prisons” and Fondef IDeA #id21i10255 “Integrated management prototype for effective social reintegration”.

E-mail: iagodoy@uc.cl

References

Anderson-Facile, D. (2009). Basic Challenges to Prisoner Reentry. Sociology Compass, 3, 183–195.

Arriagada, I., & Rochow, D. (2015). Privación de libertad en Chile: desgobierno carcelario y afectación de derechos de la población penal. En: Informe Anual sobre Derechos Humanos en Chile 2015, p. 161-207.

Auty, K. M., & Liebling, A. (2020). Exploring the relationship between prison social climate and reoffending. Justice Quarterly, 37(2), 358-381.

Bales, W. y Mears, D. (2008). Inmate Social Ties and the Transition to Society Does Visitation Reduce Recidivism? Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 45, 287-321

Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2006). Prison Population in the United States 2005. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.

Carnevale, C. (2016). Antecedentes penales y reinserción laboral en América Latina. InDret.

Christian, J. (2005). Riding the Bus: Barriers to Prison Visitation and Family Management Strategies. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 21, 31-48.

Corte Suprema de Justicia de Chile (2017). Informe de la Fiscalía de la Corte Suprema sobre las visitas a cárceles chilenas.

Dias, C. (2011). Da pulverização ao monopólio da violência: expansão e consolidação do Primeiro Comando da Capital (PCC) no sistema carcerário paulista. Tese de Doutorado, Faculdade de Filosofia, Letras e Ciências Humanas, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo.

Espinoza, O., Martínez, F. & Sanhueza, G. (2014). El Sistema Penitenciario y su impacto en las personas privadas de libertad. En: Informe sobre los Derechos Humanos en Chile 2014. Santiago: Ediciones Universidad Diego Portales

Esteban, F., Alós, R., Jódar, P., & Miguélez, F. (2014). La inserción laboral de ex reclusos. Una aproximación cualitativa. Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, 145(1), 181-204.

Fundación Paz Ciudadana (2013). Evaluación del sistema concesionado versus el sistema tradicional en la reducción de la reincidencia delictual. Inter-American Development Bank.

Fundación Paz Ciudadana & Fundación San Carlos de Maipo (2016). Estudio sobre los niveles de exclusión social en personas privadas de libertad.

Gendarmería de Chile. 2013. La reincidencia: un desafío para la gestión del sistema penitenciario chileno y las políticas públicas.

Gendarmería de Chile. 2021. Estadísticas Penitenciarias, disponibles en: http://www.gendarmeria.gob.cl/

Haney, C. (2006). Overcrowding and the Situational Pathologies of Prison. In: Reforming punishment: Psychological limits to the pains of imprisonment. The law and public policy. Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association.

Harding, D., Morenoff, J. & Herbert, C. 2011. Returning Home After Prison? Residential Mobility, Intermediate Sanctions, and Neighborhood Context among Parolees. Paper Presented at Conference on Rethinking Urban Poverty for the 21st Century City: Institutional and Organizational Perspectives, March 2011, University of Chicago.

Harding, R. (2014). Rehabilitation and prison social climate: do ‘What Works’ rehabilitation programs work better in prisons that have a positive social climate?. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 47 (2), 163-175.

Holzer, H., Raphael, S., & Stoll, M. (2002). Employment Barrirs Facing Ex-Offenders. In Employment Dimensions of Reentry: Understanding the Nexus between Prisoner Reentry and Work. Washington DC: The Urban Institute.

Instituto Nacional de Derechos Humanos, INDH (2013). Informe anual de la situación de derechos humanos en Chile 2013. Santiago de Chile: INDH.

Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas [INE]. 2018. Encuesta Nacional Urbana de Seguridad Ciudadana. Disponible en https://www.ine.cl/estadisticas/sociales/encuesta-de-seguridad-ciudadana

Kubrin, C. & Stewart, E. (2006). Predicting Who Reoffends: The Neglected Role of Neighborhood Context in Recidivism Studies. Criminology. 44, 165-197.

Laub, J. & Sampson, R. (2001). Understanding desistance from crime. In Crime and Justice: A Review of Research. M. Tonry (Ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Larroulet, P., Daza, S., Del Villar, P., Droppelmann, C., Figueroa, A., & Valenzuela, E. (2019). Estudio Reinserción, Desistimiento y Reincidencia en Mujeres: Diseño, Metodología y Caracterización de la Muestra. Santiago: Centro de Estudios Justicia y Sociedad del Instituto de Sociologia, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile. http://justiciaysociedad.uc.cl/reinsercion-y-desistimiento-en-mujeres-privadas-de-libertad-longitudinal/

La Vigne, N., Visher, C. & Castro, J. (2004). Chicago Prisoners’ Experiences Returning Home. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.

La Vigne, N., Wolf, S., & Jannetta, J. (2004). Voices of Experience: Focus Group Findings on Prisoner Reentry in the State of Rhode Island. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute

León-Mayer, E., Cortés, M. & Folino, J. (2014). Descripción multidimensional de la población carcelaria chilena. Psicoperspectivas, 13 (1), 68-81.

Liebling, A., Crewe, B., & Hulley, S. (2011). Conceptualising and measuring the quality of prison life. In: Gadd, D, Karstedt, S, Messner, SF (eds). Sage Handbook of Criminological Research Methods. London.

Lockwood, S., Nally, J., Ho, T. & Knutson, K. (2012). The Effect of Correctional Education on Postrelease Employment and Recidivism: A 5-Year Follow-Up Study in the State of Indiana. Crime & Delinquency, 58, 380-396.

Lynch, J. & Sabol, W. (2001). Prisoner Reentry in Perspective. Crime and Policy Report. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Justice Policy Center.

Marbly, A. G., & Ferguson, R. (2005). Responding to prisoner reentry, recidivism, and incarceration of inmates of color: A call to communities. Journal of Black Studies, 35, 633-649.

Mayfield, M. D. (1997). Revisiting expungement: Concealing information in the information age. Utah Law Review, 4, 1057-1085.

McKean, L. & Ransford, Ch. (2004). Current strategies for reducing recidivism. Chicago, IL: Center for Impact Research.

Mears, D., Wang, X., Hay, C. & Bales,W. (2008). Social Ecology and Recidivism: Implications for Prisoner Reentry. Criminology, 46, 301-340.

Mertz, C. (2015). Crime and Punishment in Chile. The Encyclopedia of Crime and Punishment.

Ministerio de Justicia y Derechos Humanos de Chile. 2018. http://www.minjusticia.gob.cl/reinsercion-social/

Naser, R. & La Vigne, N. (2006). Family Support in the Prisoner Reentry Process: Expectations and Realities. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 43, 93-106.

National Research Council. (2007). Parole, Desistance from Crime, and Community Integration. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.

Pager, D. (2003). The Mark of a Criminal Record. American Journal of Sociology. 108, 937-975.

Petersilia, J. (2003). When prisoners come home: Parole and prisoner reentry. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Petersilia, J. (2011). Beyond the Prison Bubble. NIJ Bulletin, 268

Rose, D. & Clear, T. (2003). Incarceration, reentry, and social capital. Prisoners once removed: The impact of incarceration and reentry on children, families, and communities 189-232.

Sampson, R. Morenoff, J. & Gannon-Rowley, T. (2002). Assessing neighborhood effects: Social processes and new directions in research. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 443–478.

Sampson, R. & Laub, J. (2005). A life-course view of the development of crime. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 602, 12–45.

Sampson, R., Laub, J. & Wimer, C. (2006). Does marriage reduce crime? A counterfactual approach to within-individual causal effects. Criminology, 44, 465–508.

Sánchez, M. y Piñol, D. (2015). Condiciones de Vida en los centros de privación de libertad en Chile. Centro de Estudios en Seguridad Ciudadana, INAP - Universidad de Chile.

Sanhueza, G., Pérez, F., Candia, J. & Urquieta, M. (2020). Inmate on inmate prison violence in Chile: the importance of the institutional context and proper supervision. Journal of Interpersonal Violence (online first).

Sanhueza, G. 2014. ¿Retorno o reintegración de la vida post-penitenciaria en Estados Unidos hoy. Revista de estudios criminológicos y penitenciarios 18, 93-110.

Sanhueza, G. & Miller, R. (2016). Prison violence in Chilean facilities: A first overview. Revista Española de Investigación Criminológica REIC, 14.

Tripodi, S., Kim, J. & Bender, K. (2010). Is Employment Associated With Reduced Recidivism? The Complex Relationship between Employment and Crime. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Compared Criminology. 54, 706-720.

Villagra, C. Hacia una política postpenitenciaria en Chile. RIL editores, 2008.

Villettaz, P., Killias, M., & Zoder, I. (2006). The effects of custodial vs. non-custodial sentences on re-offending: A systematic review of the state of the knowledge. Report to the Swiss National Science Foundation and the Campbell Collaboration Crime and Justice Group. Institute of Criminology and Criminal Law, University of Lausanne: Lausanne, Switzerland.

Visher, C., La Vigne, N. & Travis, J. (2004). Returning Home: Understanding the Challenges of Prisoner Reentry. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.

Visher, C., Baer, D., & Naser, R. (2006). Ohio Prisoners' Reflections on Returning Home. Washington, D.C.: The Urban Institute.

Wacquant, Loic. (2001). Deadly symbiosis: When ghetto and prison meet and mesh. Punishment & Society, 31, 95-133.

Western, B., Braga, A., Davies, J. & Sirois, C. (2014). Leaving Prison as a Transition to Poverty. working paper presented at Cluster for the study of social inequalities and health, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University.